Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_3.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=UCGA FASTA(n).Sequence=UCGA
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:23:29
Evaluating how sequences fit models
UCGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.17, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore  43.31, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.47, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  76.08, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AUAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.24, deficit  1.04, CutoffScore  89.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.20, deficit  4.00, CutoffScore  57.91, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.60, deficit  4.40, CutoffScore  53.73, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  88.68, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.47, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  76.08, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.84, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.89, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUGU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.47, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  76.08, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.09, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.28, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  67.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.17, deficit  2.39, CutoffScore  43.31, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.38, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  45.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCUA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.18, deficit -0.03, CutoffScore  68.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.38, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  45.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.38, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  45.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.60, deficit  2.40, CutoffScore  74.76, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.29, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  67.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.07, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  90.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.44, deficit  1.24, CutoffScore  86.98, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.60, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.23, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.08, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.96, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  53.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -7.13, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  77.43, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAUG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.99, deficit -0.14, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -7.25, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  77.61, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAAGC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.44, deficit  0.91, CutoffScore  58.88, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.30, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore  67.33, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.15, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGACU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.26, CutoffScore  34.16, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.44, deficit  3.24, CutoffScore  65.87, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GACGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -7.12, deficit  3.33, CutoffScore  33.36, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  60.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.80, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.65, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.69, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  56.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AGUUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.20, deficit  0.36, CutoffScore  64.66, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60914.1,  3 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.42, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GCAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.06, deficit  3.86, CutoffScore  59.37, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.04, deficit  1.03, CutoffScore  89.14, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GACAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.65, CutoffScore  82.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCUC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.12, deficit  1.19, CutoffScore  55.92, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -4.99, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UCCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  85.36, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
AUAAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.54, deficit  3.34, CutoffScore  64.84, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.95, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  95.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -4.95, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  95.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAUC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.41, deficit  0.20, CutoffScore  66.28, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UAAAA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.12, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.67, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.08, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GAUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.16, CutoffScore  66.68, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.25, CutoffScore  86.81, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCUUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.33, deficit  3.13, CutoffScore  67.08, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCGG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.02, deficit  0.18, CutoffScore  34.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AUUAU 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -4.46, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.53, ed  2, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
CAAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -5.31, deficit  0.77, CutoffScore  60.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_07886.3,  5 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score     -10.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  48.12, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGCAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.54, deficit  0.36, CutoffScore  96.19, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CACUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76094.1,  5 NTs,                 CAAUG,score      -3.96, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  56.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CUGGUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.97, deficit  0.09, CutoffScore  99.06, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-cSH                               
CUGUCG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -9.51, deficit  6.31, CutoffScore  33.55, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.86, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  78.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUCCAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score     -10.74, deficit  8.35, CutoffScore  26.03, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUUGAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.48, deficit  1.00, CutoffScore  57.87, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGCUCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -5.85, deficit  1.37, CutoffScore  53.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
ACAUGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -7.20, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  53.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.78, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAGAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.92, deficit  2.16, CutoffScore  77.49, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAGCC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.44, deficit  5.68, CutoffScore  40.76, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAGGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -8.89, deficit  2.79, CutoffScore  39.02, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.69, deficit  3.93, CutoffScore  59.03, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.00, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  60.05, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.16, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UCAAGA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -9.99, deficit  8.05, CutoffScore  19.37, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GCAAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.45, deficit  4.69, CutoffScore  51.12, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUGAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -12.99, deficit  5.47, CutoffScore  47.52, ed  1, 0 cWW-cWS-F                               
CCAGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_59843.1,  6 NTs,               UCAAUGA,score      -6.00, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -5.83, deficit -0.31, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUACAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.94, deficit  1.81, CutoffScore  49.40, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUUCCA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.01, deficit -0.22, CutoffScore  70.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_71391.1,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -5.81, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  78.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGGAGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.13, deficit  6.37, CutoffScore  33.64, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.27, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore  63.99, ed  0, 0 cWW-cWS-F                               
GAUUCC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.03, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  56.71, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCUUCC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.62, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  60.99, ed  1, 1 cWW                                     
AGAAGU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.41, deficit  4.65, CutoffScore  51.51, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAUUG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.45, deficit  0.31, CutoffScore  65.12, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGCUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_38901.2,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.20, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  54.61, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-cSH                               
CUCUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.23, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  62.62, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAGCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.77, deficit  1.67, CutoffScore  82.39, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.27, deficit  3.07, CutoffScore  67.71, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.20, deficit  3.00, CutoffScore  68.46, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUAGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.64, deficit  4.88, CutoffScore  49.18, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUGCGC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_99040.1,  6 NTs,                UUGCGG,score      -7.03, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  66.47, ed  2, 0 F-F-F-F-F-F                             
CGGAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -8.04, deficit  4.03, CutoffScore  57.61, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCCCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -5.34, deficit  0.86, CutoffScore  90.92, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAGCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.91, deficit  2.44, CutoffScore  42.78, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUUCC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -5.86, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  78.54, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAACG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_22584.6,  5 NTs,               GAAACAC,score     -10.69, deficit  8.29, CutoffScore  26.52, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUUUGG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.95, deficit  3.01, CutoffScore  69.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUGUUC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.30, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.01, deficit  7.25, CutoffScore  24.40, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GACGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.11, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUACGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -3.39, deficit  1.44, CutoffScore  85.53, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUACGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -3.39, deficit  1.44, CutoffScore  85.53, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CAUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUGGCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.28, deficit -0.11, CutoffScore  38.05, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCGUCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -9.71, deficit  3.03, CutoffScore  36.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGUCAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.76, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  25.34, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSW-F                               
GCUAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.44, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  65.22, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAAAUC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.01, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUCAUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.52, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  58.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CAGUCAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.26, deficit  2.24, CutoffScore  24.40, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
CCCGUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -8.75, deficit  0.67, CutoffScore  40.87, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCGUCAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -9.05, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  38.21, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCCUUCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -8.93, deficit  4.49, CutoffScore  15.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
UAAGUAA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.91, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  53.02, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCCAAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -6.83, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  55.44, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAGCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score     -10.57, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  21.35, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAAUUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.20, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.70, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
GGUUUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.54, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  57.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUCAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -7.17, deficit  3.83, CutoffScore  71.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
GGCUGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.06, CutoffScore  46.73, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUCUGAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -8.22, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  27.09, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGUCCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67667.2,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -6.50, deficit  2.11, CutoffScore  52.24, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUGUAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -6.56, deficit  0.11, CutoffScore  67.24, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAGGAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -6.60, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  44.53, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUCUUUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -5.87, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  39.86, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CGCAAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -7.02, deficit  1.35, CutoffScore  54.19, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGAGUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  64.63, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUGAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.77, deficit -0.63, CutoffScore  43.43, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUGGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.07, deficit  1.47, CutoffScore  52.99, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAGCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -7.52, deficit  1.07, CutoffScore  38.34, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUGGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.38, deficit  0.98, CutoffScore  26.48, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAAAUCA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -9.05, deficit  2.92, CutoffScore  37.68, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
ACUGUGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.84, deficit  3.91, CutoffScore  27.31, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUGAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.26, deficit -1.14, CutoffScore  48.80, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGUUUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.38, deficit  2.74, CutoffScore  52.63, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
GGAUUAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.97, deficit  0.41, CutoffScore  64.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
UAAAGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -9.45, deficit  4.54, CutoffScore  39.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAUUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -8.20, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.65, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F                               
CGGUAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.71, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  35.24, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F                               
UGCGCAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.65, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  44.39, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -6.29, deficit  1.96, CutoffScore  47.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.25, deficit -1.15, CutoffScore  48.92, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUUUAAA 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -5.55, deficit  0.46, CutoffScore  95.48, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUCACAA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -9.53, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  28.36, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  54.82, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCCGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.23, deficit  1.64, CutoffScore   3.82, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GACUCAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.95, deficit  1.93, CutoffScore  54.75, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
AUCGACU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.65, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  34.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGUGUUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78347.4,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score      -9.62, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  51.97, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUCAUAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.91, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  67.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGGUUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -8.75, deficit  0.67, CutoffScore  40.87, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUGUCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -6.17, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  63.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAUGUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.05, deficit -0.51, CutoffScore  42.22, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F                               
GAUGGAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.99, deficit  2.52, CutoffScore  52.08, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGACAAAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -5.80, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  61.08, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCCAGCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score     -10.76, deficit  3.26, CutoffScore  16.78, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -5.81, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  41.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAGAGCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score     -10.62, deficit  5.98, CutoffScore  26.96, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CACCGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -15.17, deficit  5.44, CutoffScore   6.81, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AGCGUAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.11, deficit  3.50, CutoffScore  30.04, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GAUUAAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.50, deficit  1.49, CutoffScore  39.84, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
AGAAUUUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.82, deficit  3.44, CutoffScore  32.25, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUAGAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -7.61, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  83.34, ed  2, 0 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CGUUAGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score     -10.99, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  54.58, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AAGAGACU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  66.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUUCGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score     -11.40, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  38.04, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AGCCAGGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.91, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  52.41, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAAUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_39243.1,  6 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.70, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.12, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -5.81, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  41.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUGGCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score      -7.10, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  41.34, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAUUCAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_31585.4,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -8.49, deficit  2.05, CutoffScore  15.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCCGUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.59, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  13.71, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCUACAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.01, deficit  5.58, CutoffScore  26.74, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUCGAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_00914.1,  6 NTs,              GGUCAAAC,score      -6.59, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  63.40, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGUCAAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_00914.1,  6 NTs,              GGUCAAAC,score      -9.30, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  65.93, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCUGAUCA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_33983.1,  7 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -10.05, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  31.77, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score      -8.83, deficit  0.81, CutoffScore  37.47, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCGAAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score      -7.51, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAUAGUGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_84299.4,  8 NTs,             GAUAGUGGC,score      -6.36, deficit  1.07, CutoffScore  70.95, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUAGGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_77436.5,  7 NTs,              CUUAAUUG,score      -8.03, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  50.69, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUCAUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -9.43, deficit  3.64, CutoffScore  37.99, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GUUUCAUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.33, deficit  1.32, CutoffScore  41.21, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
CGUGAGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.44, deficit  1.71, CutoffScore  54.57, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUGCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.50, deficit  0.92, CutoffScore  58.69, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUAAACUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -6.23, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  47.91, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CGAAGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -6.77, deficit  2.85, CutoffScore  29.52, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGAGGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -9.30, deficit  4.54, CutoffScore  39.71, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CUCCGUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -13.90, deficit 10.80, CutoffScore  11.00, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GCAAAAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.92, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  50.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGCAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -11.75, deficit  4.01, CutoffScore  34.46, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUUGAAGA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score      -8.90, deficit  3.73, CutoffScore  41.17, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
AUUAUCCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score     -10.88, deficit  3.37, CutoffScore  15.72, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCCUCGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.74, deficit  0.33, CutoffScore  33.32, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
AGUCCAAU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_00914.1,  6 NTs,              GGUCAAAC,score      -7.15, deficit  1.67, CutoffScore  58.33, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUAAAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_00914.1,  6 NTs,              GGUCAAAC,score      -5.49, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  73.21, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAGGUGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score      -8.75, deficit  0.04, CutoffScore  47.99, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCUGGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -9.78, deficit  2.04, CutoffScore  51.32, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUGUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  33.89, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AAAAGAUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.09, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  66.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAAGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.39, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  89.41, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAGCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -7.86, deficit  3.95, CutoffScore  20.77, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAAGGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.50, deficit  2.12, CutoffScore  14.57, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAUGGUUCG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.58, deficit  0.83, CutoffScore  33.13, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUAAUCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.60, deficit  4.21, CutoffScore  24.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUAAUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score     -10.80, deficit  4.79, CutoffScore  37.44, ed  1, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
UUCGUCGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -10.04, deficit  4.47, CutoffScore  41.31, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
CCCUUUGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -11.80, deficit  5.38, CutoffScore  11.25, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CUUUCGAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -10.32, deficit  3.83, CutoffScore  27.22, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GUGUUCUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -8.51, deficit  3.17, CutoffScore  64.01, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
GAAAUUAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  43.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAUAAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.67, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore  30.98, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
GCCAAUUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -12.13, deficit  6.56, CutoffScore   6.56, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CACUGGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -8.85, deficit  1.72, CutoffScore  50.71, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
GGGGACCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -13.13, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore   8.20, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAGCAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.90, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  15.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAUUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  43.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCGACUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.26, deficit  2.53, CutoffScore  44.20, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUUCCGAUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.79, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  69.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW                                 
CUUCGCACG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -8.68, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  46.06, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGAGCAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score      -9.23, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  24.83, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F                         
GUUUUGUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -10.40, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  36.84, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUGUCAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score      -6.98, deficit  1.40, CutoffScore  69.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GCGAACAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score      -9.24, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  30.47, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGUGGAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.40, deficit  4.26, CutoffScore  51.78, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAACCAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.56, deficit  1.81, CutoffScore  52.91, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAUUUAAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score     -10.09, deficit  4.08, CutoffScore  19.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
AGGGACAUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -10.38, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  28.56, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AGUCAAAAU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.91, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  38.91, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
UGAGCCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score     -13.18, deficit  7.60, CutoffScore   4.46, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCGAAACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score     -11.55, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore   9.75, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAAGCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -8.46, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  30.16, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAACGACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score      -9.86, deficit  3.40, CutoffScore  41.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGUUGUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score      -7.74, deficit  0.40, CutoffScore  60.92, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
CUUUCGAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score     -10.32, deficit  3.83, CutoffScore  27.22, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
UCCUAGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -12.24, deficit  6.94, CutoffScore  10.75, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGUUUUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.07, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  44.13, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGGAAAGCA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87553.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score     -10.28, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  20.54, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
ACUUUUCGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_09452.1,  5 NTs,             UAGGGGCUA,score     -11.32, deficit  2.60, CutoffScore   0.03, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUUUGCAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score     -10.02, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  26.61, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGUCAACUA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.48, deficit  6.19, CutoffScore  26.65, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUCUUAGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -8.79, deficit  0.54, CutoffScore  21.32, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
CGAGCGAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.78, deficit  3.04, CutoffScore  30.88, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
ACAUCCCAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -12.20, deficit  2.46, CutoffScore  55.50, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUGGGGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.83, deficit  1.09, CutoffScore  45.76, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUGGAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_50860.2,  9 NTs,             GUCGGACAU,score     -10.31, deficit  5.68, CutoffScore  45.96, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F                       
GAGACUUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -10.97, deficit  3.23, CutoffScore  39.58, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAACGAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -11.03, deficit  4.57, CutoffScore  15.29, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGGAAGGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -7.28, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  33.85, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
AUUGCCGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score      -7.80, deficit  2.22, CutoffScore  63.30, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAGGUAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -10.26, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore  45.56, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
UUCUUCCGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.20, deficit  4.83, CutoffScore  10.20, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGAACGGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.41, deficit  4.59, CutoffScore  51.99, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GGGGAAUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -8.73, deficit  2.91, CutoffScore  24.69, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CGACAUCUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -16.43, deficit  9.31, CutoffScore  21.76, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAAAAAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.35, deficit  3.70, CutoffScore  42.51, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
AGCAAAACAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.58, deficit  6.32, CutoffScore   3.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GUGCUGAAUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.11, deficit  6.29, CutoffScore  22.27, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GAAGAUUUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_07480.2,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -12.69, deficit  5.44, CutoffScore  23.12, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
UGUAAAAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score     -12.26, deficit  6.54, CutoffScore  16.46, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
CAGAGCCUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -14.89, deficit  7.77, CutoffScore  14.30, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAAGGGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.53, deficit  3.72, CutoffScore  19.61, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CGAGUCGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score      -9.75, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  23.27, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUCACGAUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.50, deficit  6.22, CutoffScore  31.87, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
GCGGCAAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -10.44, deficit  2.37, CutoffScore  31.02, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCGUAAUAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -10.39, deficit  2.08, CutoffScore  66.04, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUUCACGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -11.36, deficit  4.93, CutoffScore  14.75, ed  3, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
GGCGAAAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36335.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.98, deficit  2.07, CutoffScore  21.67, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F                       
CGAUAAAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score      -8.87, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  56.19, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAAUUGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.65, deficit  1.31, CutoffScore  45.30, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCGAGAACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -17.90, deficit  9.82, CutoffScore  20.02, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AUUGGACGAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.35, deficit  1.76, CutoffScore  24.18, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAUUGUAUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -12.37, deficit  2.81, CutoffScore  44.64, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCUGCUCUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -6.35, deficit  2.07, CutoffScore  38.27, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
UAAAAUAAAA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.84, deficit  1.49, CutoffScore  43.91, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUGUUUGGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -10.14, deficit  3.96, CutoffScore  30.98, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
UGAGGCAUAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_88205.2,  7 NTs,            ACGUGCAAAU,score     -10.97, deficit  5.25, CutoffScore  25.07, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F                         
GGUAAAAAUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score      -9.73, deficit  1.41, CutoffScore  30.38, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGAUUCGAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -10.70, deficit  5.11, CutoffScore  25.35, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAACAGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score      -9.01, deficit -0.33, CutoffScore  57.54, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGAAAACACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.47, deficit  5.97, CutoffScore  18.00, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CCGACAUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score     -11.60, deficit  5.98, CutoffScore  33.84, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
GAAAACUGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04641.1,  7 NTs,            CAAGACGACG,score     -11.12, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore  14.69, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CACUUUGCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -11.49, deficit  4.36, CutoffScore  14.68, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CUUCAGUGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.34, deficit  3.75, CutoffScore  10.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUCCUGGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.28, deficit  1.69, CutoffScore  45.77, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGGGUGGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -10.15, deficit  5.13, CutoffScore  19.45, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
UUGAACUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -16.45, deficit 11.11, CutoffScore  13.11, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCCAUUUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.60, deficit  3.51, CutoffScore   5.82, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CGAAUGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  49.55, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGUGGGAAUA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.60, deficit  2.45, CutoffScore  43.84, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGUACAGUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -11.47, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  53.74, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGUUCAGCU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -11.33, deficit  5.14, CutoffScore  40.63, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
CUGCUGACUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -10.71, deficit  3.42, CutoffScore  25.25, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGCGUAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -11.26, deficit  2.95, CutoffScore  20.12, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAACGGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.72, deficit  4.57, CutoffScore  29.75, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGUUUCAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.53, deficit  3.44, CutoffScore   6.28, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
AAUUGAAGUU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -10.34, deficit  5.32, CutoffScore  18.35, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
GUGUUUCAUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -13.77, deficit  4.22, CutoffScore  16.94, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CACCUAUCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -14.94, deficit  6.87, CutoffScore  12.31, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCGGAAUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -16.73, deficit  5.99, CutoffScore  32.77, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UAAUGCCAUUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.23, deficit  5.23, CutoffScore  21.44, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGUUUAAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -12.27, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  25.75, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAGAAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -11.34, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  37.42, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAUUCAAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -13.85, deficit  7.10, CutoffScore  10.93, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGCUAUCCACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -13.73, deficit  5.92, CutoffScore  12.83, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUAGCCAUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -11.11, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  11.78, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UUUGAAUUGAA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.67, deficit  5.05, CutoffScore  30.68, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAUGGUGCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -10.64, deficit  3.26, CutoffScore  39.83, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAACAAUCCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -12.15, deficit  5.03, CutoffScore  12.98, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUGAUUAGACA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -11.52, deficit  2.47, CutoffScore  33.93, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUAUUGAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.43, deficit  4.28, CutoffScore  11.76, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAGAAAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -13.24, deficit  4.98, CutoffScore  31.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CGUCUGAUCCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.07, deficit  1.45, CutoffScore  15.63, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AGUAUUGAACU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -14.09, deficit  6.28, CutoffScore  10.76, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGUUCUGAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -12.60, deficit  5.62, CutoffScore  35.50, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAAUUUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -11.43, deficit  2.09, CutoffScore  16.96, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUUAAGCUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.54, deficit  4.73, CutoffScore   2.27, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUCUCCCUCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_45785.1, 10 NTs,           GUUCCCUCACC,score     -16.86, deficit 10.35, CutoffScore   1.00, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F                     
CUGUGUUACUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -11.38, deficit  1.83, CutoffScore  13.12, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
ACAGAGUCGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -12.79, deficit  3.85, CutoffScore   1.33, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUUCCGAUUGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -10.85, deficit  2.77, CutoffScore  40.47, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAUGCGAGAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -15.95, deficit  7.08, CutoffScore  10.68, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCAUCUGCACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -13.51, deficit  3.26, CutoffScore   6.74, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CGACAUUUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.72, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore   6.70, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CAAUGUUAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -12.57, deficit  4.75, CutoffScore   2.12, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GCAAAAAACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score      -9.80, deficit  3.14, CutoffScore  28.02, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
UUGGGAAAUAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50418.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGCAGGCAC,score     -14.41, deficit  5.47, CutoffScore   9.96, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAAAUGUAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -13.11, deficit  5.34, CutoffScore   4.52, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUCUUAAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.61, deficit  6.96, CutoffScore   5.41, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
AUACUUAGGUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04725.1,  8 NTs,          GUUACUUAGUUC,score     -13.88, deficit  8.85, CutoffScore  26.58, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS                     
GAAGAUAAUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -11.76, deficit  2.76, CutoffScore  18.50, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAAUAACCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_55305.1,  5 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -13.49, deficit  4.08, CutoffScore   9.44, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGCUAAACCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score      -9.49, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  35.71, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
UUAAGGCUGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93135.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -12.83, deficit  4.30, CutoffScore  19.25, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
ACGAAAAUAAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -11.70, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  14.95, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAAGUGUCAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -11.64, deficit  3.87, CutoffScore  45.68, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUAUCUAACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -14.21, deficit  3.60, CutoffScore  20.99, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGCGCCUACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -11.77, deficit  4.65, CutoffScore  30.25, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAACUUCCCUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -12.32, deficit  5.20, CutoffScore  12.12, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUAAGAGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.05, deficit  6.40, CutoffScore   8.73, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
GUAACAGGGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.55, deficit  8.32, CutoffScore  28.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCACGCACUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67407.5, 10 NTs,           CGACCGUCUGG,score     -16.49, deficit  9.37, CutoffScore   6.12, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCCUACAGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98864.1, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -13.99, deficit  9.36, CutoffScore  22.96, ed  2, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GAACAGUCGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -10.66, deficit  5.43, CutoffScore  12.83, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUCGGCAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_29129.3,  8 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.95, deficit  4.07, CutoffScore  23.17, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
CGAAUUAAAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.26, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  23.16, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUUUGCAGAGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -17.21, deficit  8.34, CutoffScore   3.69, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAGAGUUGUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.30, deficit  4.53, CutoffScore   9.33, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUGGUGGUUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.38, deficit  4.61, CutoffScore  25.30, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CACAUUUGGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.26, deficit  5.49, CutoffScore   4.05, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CAGCAAAUAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -13.24, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore   5.14, ed  4, 4 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAUACUUAUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04725.1,  8 NTs,          GUUACUUAGUUC,score     -12.85, deficit  7.82, CutoffScore  31.66, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS                     
UAUCCUUCUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_09260.2,  6 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -13.84, deficit  3.60, CutoffScore   6.54, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAAAGCCUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_15118.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -14.13, deficit  5.57, CutoffScore  11.10, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CAAGCUCGUGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.51, deficit  4.74, CutoffScore  24.60, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUAAAAUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -14.15, deficit  5.89, CutoffScore  25.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GAUUGCAGUCAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_15118.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -10.83, deficit  2.27, CutoffScore  58.14, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CUCAAAAUGACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -11.80, deficit  3.73, CutoffScore  34.33, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CGAAGUCAAUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -15.91, deficit  6.91, CutoffScore  28.71, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGCUACAACGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.38, deficit  7.31, CutoffScore   0.40, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
AUUCCACAAAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -11.73, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  30.47, ed  5, 3 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUCACACUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -14.84, deficit  6.76, CutoffScore   5.14, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUGUAUUCGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -13.90, deficit  3.29, CutoffScore  41.74, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCUAUCCACCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.20, deficit  3.54, CutoffScore  12.17, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AAUGGACAUUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_15118.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -14.15, deficit  5.59, CutoffScore  10.99, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAAAAAAGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.84, deficit  7.77, CutoffScore  13.52, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
AUUAGAUUGACU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -13.41, deficit  3.97, CutoffScore  19.91, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
AACGGAAGGAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41902.1, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.13, deficit  7.50, CutoffScore   2.48, ed  5, 4 cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F                   
AGAAUAUAUUAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.35, deficit  4.69, CutoffScore  22.62, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GCCGAGAGAUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.75, deficit  4.67, CutoffScore  15.69, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGAAGUACGCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -15.40, deficit  7.63, CutoffScore   8.46, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAAAUAUAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_47732.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -10.78, deficit  3.92, CutoffScore  20.97, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUUCCUGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.06, deficit  4.39, CutoffScore   7.34, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GUACUUCAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -12.17, deficit  3.51, CutoffScore  12.33, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGUGAAAAACUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.65, deficit  7.57, CutoffScore  16.22, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUGAUCUGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -14.50, deficit  5.62, CutoffScore   2.10, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUUGGAGAAUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_31581.6, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.62, deficit  6.47, CutoffScore   7.64, ed  5, 4 cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F                 
GAAGUCAGGACCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.20, deficit  5.80, CutoffScore   7.87, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CAUAAUAUGAGUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -16.01, deficit  5.23, CutoffScore   9.90, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UGAAUUCACUAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88558.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -19.05, deficit 10.38, CutoffScore   7.40, ed  3, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GGAUUAUCGGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -16.17, deficit  8.39, CutoffScore  13.03, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
AGGGGAAUAUCAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.52, deficit  4.12, CutoffScore   1.07, ed  6, 5 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CCAAAAAAUUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -15.44, deficit  7.37, CutoffScore   0.12, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GGAGGUGAAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11542.1, 10 NTs,         CGAGCGGCCAAAG,score     -14.48, deficit  4.95, CutoffScore   5.61, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAAACUAUAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -12.66, deficit  4.59, CutoffScore  45.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
CAAAUUUGAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -14.85, deficit  6.55, CutoffScore  17.64, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
CCCAAAUUAAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -16.64, deficit  8.57, CutoffScore   9.37, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
GGAAUUGCGAAGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -15.89, deficit  7.59, CutoffScore  12.13, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
GGGAGCGAGUGAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -17.53, deficit  3.40, CutoffScore  25.67, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGCAGGGCUUGAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -14.64, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  43.00, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGAUCGCGCUAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68572.1,  9 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -17.23, deficit  3.10, CutoffScore   9.49, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUUGUCGAAUUCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.11, deficit  5.71, CutoffScore   8.34, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CGAGAAGCAGAGGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73183.1, 14 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -17.31, deficit  7.09, CutoffScore  17.31, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
CUUCAGAAUCAUGGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89346.1, 17 NTs,  AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU,score     -27.10, deficit  9.27, CutoffScore   2.93, ed  5, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F       
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 96.0000	 10.0000	  0.0000
[11 11]	 92.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 62.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 22.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	 10.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 76.0000	 72.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	 92.0000	 54.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 94.0000	 68.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 44.0000	  6.0000
[8 8]	 98.0000	 40.0000	  8.0000
[9 9]	 98.0000	 18.0000	  0.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence   5 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence  20 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence  21 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence  24 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence  31 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence  40 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence  43 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence  45 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 152 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 170 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 207 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 225 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 227 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 256 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 268 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 308 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 311 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 314 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 323 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 344 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 350 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Overall false positive rate is 11.3077%
Number of models giving false positives is 229 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     2.67
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     4.82
